Entry
Three:
Quote:
|
“If
something can be learned, it can be learned in a motivating manner…every
instructional, plan also needs to be a motivational plan.”[1]
|
||
Section:
|
Wlodkowski
and Ginsberg’s Integrated levels of adult motivation
|
Ch. 8
|
Motivation
and learning
|
Objective:
In this chapter the reader is introduced to things
that motivates learners. Motivation is the thing that moves a person for a
cause; the driving energy we put into doing something. There are several
theories on motivation, not the least of which incorporates the learning
theories that we previously read in chapter two. In the chapter we looked at
motivation being both intrinsic and extrinsic, depending on the situation. The
three key contexts of adult motivation in education help justify the quote used
in this journal entry.[2]
Reflective:
I originally wanted to work with McClusky’s Theory
of Margin, as I thought it was an interesting way to show the idea of coping /
crisis with the idea of motivation. I instead decided to go with Wlodkowski’s
work, because it seamed more substantial and practical, and thus more adequate
for the reflective than McClusky’s. In fact, it is sort of my mantra in
designing lesson plans. I presently teach business law, because no one else in
my department wanted to. The reason being is that it can be dry if the learner
or trainer are not motivated. I have had to employ many of Wlodkowski’s
motivational strategies, listed in the text from page 159 – 161 (table 8.4);
although I was not previously aware of who had developed them prior to reading
this chapter.
Interpretive:
Jeanne Ellis
Ormrod in her 2003 work states that Motivation in education can result in:
·
Direct behavior toward particular goals
·
Lead to increased effort and energy
·
Increase initiation of, and persistence in, activities
·
Enhance cognitive processing
·
Determine what consequences are reinforcing
·
Lead to improved performance[3]
This should lead the trainer to the conclusion that
motivation is important for the learner to learn. Wlodkowski’s motivational
strategies give a vary detailed outline of how to proceed with what is needed
to motivate, and why. A diagram from his collaboration with Ginsberg in 2009 on
Motivational Framework for Culturally Responsive Teaching looks at four areas
to address (diagram above).[4]
They are inclusion, attitude, meaning and competence.
Decisional:
In NEC, where I work, there are motivational factors specific to First
Nations communities. Although FN learners are sometimes perceived by those
outside of their communities as lackadaisical or not motivated towards
academia, they are just as capable as any other learner. This fact in itself is
not too unusual, but the ideas of what motivates them are. Their need for
social and cultural inclusion is one factor that is used as a motivational tool
in course design. Meaning is also crucial, and closely linked with social and
community values.
The
college understands that engagement of the learner through motivational
techniques results in their best leaning outcomes. We use motivational
strategies 33 (individual interests), 35 (humor), 45 (games), and many more
than will allow my word count for this journal entry.
[1]
Wlodkowski,
R. J. (2008). Enhancing adult motivation to the learner: A comprehensive guide
for teaching all adults (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
[2]
Merriam
S.B. & Bierema, L. L (2014). Adult Learning: Linking Theory and Practice.
Wiley & Sons. P. 156
[3]
Ormrod,
J. E. (2003). Educational psychology: developing learners. Upper Saddle River,
N.J.: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
[4] Ginsberg, M.
B., and R. J. Wlodkowski. 2009. Diversity and motivation: Culturally responsive
teaching in college. (2nd ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
No comments:
Post a Comment